Obert v. Saville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the court is “not a repository into which an appellant may foist the burden of argument and research”
• “Bare contentions in the absence of argument or citation of authority do not merit consideration on appeal and are deemed waived”
• it is not the appellate court’s obligation to comb the record for contentions of error
• Appellate court “is not a repository into which an appellant may foist the burden of argument and research.”
• The appellate court “is not a repository into which an appellant may foist the burden of argument and research.”
• “A reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and cohesive arguments presented ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).