Skip to main content

Steinberg v. State

Citations

  • 941 N.E.2d 515
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 52
  • 2011 WL 193411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s instructions correctly stating the law are presumed to cure any misstatement of the law by a prosecutor in closing argument
  • stating that for mental illness to be a significant mitigating factor, “there must be a nexus” between the mental illness and the Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-CR-2164 | March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 9 crimes at issue
  • “Rule 704(b) does not prohibit presentation of evidence that leads to an inference, even if no witness could state [an] opinion with respect to that inference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Friedlander, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.