Skip to main content
· 8/21/2014

James S. Littrell v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 15 N.E.3d 646
  • 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 408
  • 2014 WL 4109591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding enhanced sentence was not inappropriate in light of defendant’s criminal history and repeated failure to successfully complete drug treatment programs
  • defendant’s inability to complete drug treatment programs and the presence of petitions to revoke defendant’s probation confirm appropriateness of sentence
  • defendant’s inability to complete drug treatment programs, continued use of drugs after treatment was administered during incarceration, and the presence of petitions to revoke defendant’s probation, confirm appropriateness of sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Kirsch, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.