Skip to main content

Statler v. Catalano

Citations

  • 691 N.E.2d 384
  • 293 Ill. App. 3d 483
  • 229 Ill. Dec. 274
  • 1997 Ill. App. LEXIS 900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Davis v. Temple , 284 Ill. App. 3d 983, 989, 673 N.E.2d 737, 741 (1996)
  • res judicata does not bar claim based on intervening change in law
  • res judicata does not bar claim based on intervening change in law
  • “Res judicata does not operate as an automatic bar where between the time of the first and the second there has been an intervening decision or a change in the law creating an altered situation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kuehn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.