Statler v. Catalano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding jury award even though distinction between temporary and permanent nuisance was never submitted to the jury
• upholding jury award even though distinction between temporary and permanent nuisance was never submitted to the jury
• finding evidence used to prove that the defendants’ actions caused plaintiffs’ annoyance and extreme discomfort was relevant because it “relate[d] to the element of material annoyance of plaintiffs and *** to the use and enjoyment of plaintiffs’ home” (emphasis added)
• finding evidence used to prove that the defendants’ actions caused plaintiffs’ annoyance and extreme discomfort was relevant because it “relate[d] to the element of material annoyance of plaintiffs and *** to the use and enjoyment of plaintiffs’ home” (emphasis added)
• “The standard for determining if particular conduct is unreasonable is determined by the effect it would have on a normal person of ordinary habits and sensibilities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).