Bernstein v. Department of Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing at length and rejecting the argument that due process requires the selection of the least restrictive alternative in treating mental disorders
• discussing at length and rejecting the argument that due process requires the selection of the least restrictive alternative in treating mental disorders
• “A change in law occurring between two successive causes of action on the same subject matter renders res judicata inapplicable ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).