Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/19/2008
State v. Zimmer
Citations
- 146 Wash. App. 405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing condition that defendant not have a cell phone after finding “no evidence in the record” that defendant used cell phones to facilitate drug possession or distribution
- reversing condition that defendant not have a cell phone after finding \no evidence in the record\ that defendant used cell phones to facilitate drug possession or distribution
- striking a condition prohibiting cell phone use when no evidence in the record supported a finding that defendant used the device in connection with the crime
- “ ‘The unconstitutionality of a community custody condition is not ripe for review unless the person is harmfully affected by the . . . condition.’ ” (quoting State v. Autrey, 136 Wn. App. 460, 470, 150 P.3d 580 (2006))
- condition must be directly related to the crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deren, Hunt, Penoyar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Of Washington v. Samuel Lee IrwinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-14· cited 209×
- State v. KolesnikCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-09-16· cited 90×
- State v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-08· cited 31×
- State v. ValenciaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-13· cited 28×
- State Of Washington v. Brandon McwilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-08
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 388×
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 350×
- People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 245×
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court· 2007-01-25· cited 173×
- State v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-08· cited 57×
- State v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-17· cited 57×
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-08· cited 49×
- State v. AutreyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-12-28· cited 45×
- State v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-06· cited 31×
- State v. JulianCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-29· cited 28×
- State v. MotterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-24· cited 23×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-05· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.