State v. Letourneau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that “limitations on fundamental rights during community custody” must be “reasonably necessary to accomplish the essential needs of the [S]tate.”
• noting that family and juvenile courts are \more appropriate forums than the criminal sentencing process to address the best interests of dependent children with respect to most visitation issues.\
• noting that family and juvenile courts are “more appropriate forums than the criminal sentencing process to address the best interests of dependent children with respect to most visitation issues”
• declining to impose a no-contact order between the defendant and her children because there was no evidence she was a pedophile or posed a danger of molesting her children
• concerning conditions of sentencing related to a second degree child rape conviction
• concerning conditions of sentencing related to a second degree child rape conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Warren
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 511×
• State v. Ancira
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-30· cited 93×
• State v. Berg
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-12-29· cited 87×
• State v. Corbett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-11-16· cited 80×
• State v. Letourneau
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-08· cited 57×
• State v. Autrey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-12-28· cited 45×
• State v. Hearn
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-02-09· cited 43×
• State of Washington v. Joseph Edward Geyer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-09-28· cited 33×
• State v. Zimmer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-08-19· cited 21×
• In Re Waggy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-07· cited 18×
• State v. Rice
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-19· cited 15×
• State v. Sanford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-07· cited 11×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-12· cited 6×
• State v. Waggy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-07· cited 1×
• State of Washington v. Patrick Gale Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-08-15
• In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Kyle Robert Sickels
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-08-04

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meyer v. Nebraska
  Supreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
• Prince v. Massachusetts
  Supreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 2,515×
• Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-04-16· cited 1,592×
• State v. Riley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 350×
• Smith v. Stillwell-Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
• Bering v. Share
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 256×
• State v. Riles
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 204×
• Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 124×
• United States v. Valerie Terrigno
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-02-02· cited 85×
• State v. Parramore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-02-27· cited 47×
• Daniel B. v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-07· cited 37×
• Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California
  Supreme Court· 1999-09-28· cited 14×
• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 1999-09-28· cited 7×