Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/28/2020
State v. Stepp
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 6901
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial where the defendant failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he could not have learned of the existence of the new evidence within the 120-day period provided by Crim.R. 33.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-02-23· cited 698×
- State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 43×
- State v. Rodriguez-BaronOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-16· cited 26×
- State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-18· cited 10×
- State v. BelcherOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-24· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.