Skip to main content

State v. Young

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3047

Syllabus

Search and seizure, manifest weight of the evidence, inconsistent verdicts, disproportionate sentences, merger, firearm specification, weapon while under disability. The officers had probable cause to stop appellant's vehicle for committing a traffic offense and to search the vehicle after observing drugs and guns in plain view and the verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The exoneration of appellant's codefendant did not constitute an inconsistent verdict. Sentences between two codefendants are not disproportionate where one defendant is determined to be not guilty. A firearm specification and the charge of having a weapon while under disability are not allied offenses.

Judges: Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.