Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/1/2006
State v. Curry
Citations
- 209 Or. App. 31
- 146 P.3d 348
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he trial court is authorized only to correct the error that was identified by the post-conviction court.”
- “[T]he proper distinction is between the correction of errors requiring resentencing on remand after direct appeal, which the legislature has determined requires resentencing on all convictions in a case [under former ORS 138.222(5
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Ortega, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court· 2006-03-09· cited 282×
- Gordon Sayre Little v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1954-08-02· cited 28×
- Baty v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 25×
- State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-04-03· cited 24×
- Baty v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-05· cited 22×
- Wood v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-01-13· cited 18×
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-01-29· cited 10×
- Curry v. PalmateerNinth Circuit· 2003-04-16· cited 3×
- State v. WaageCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.