Skip to main content
· 6/23/2017

State v. Duhl

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 5492

Syllabus

The trial court did not punish Appellant in violation of his right to remain silent during the sentencing hearing. Although Appellant had the right to remain silent during sentencing, the trial court could consider the defendant's failure to speak in the context of lack of remorse. This is an appropriate sentencing consideration under R.C. 2929.12(D)(5) and (E)(5). Affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.