Court of Appeals of Arizona· 9/4/1998

State v. Wooten

Citations

972 P.2d 993
193 Ariz. 357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting defendant’s claim that jury commissioner’s pres-creening of prospective jurors violated his due process rights based in part on the jury commissioner’s broad statutory power to excuse jurors from service
rejecting claims that a jury commissioner’s prescreen of prospective jurors for length of the trial excluded poor and minority jurors because the defendant failed to satisfy any of the Duren prongs
finding no violation of Arizona Rule of Evidence 106 when the opposing party had adequate notice and opportunity to contextualize the excerpts played
upholding superior court's discretion in its decision to play excerpts of tapes without requiring the entire recordings to be played
finding a defendant’s hearsay statement is admissible if it fits within a recognized exception to the hearsay rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Thompson, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.