Skip to main content

State v. Woods

Citations

  • 866 So. 2d 422
  • 2003 WL 22351316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[u]sually . . . corroborating evidence consists of a statement that the officer had successfully used the CI in the past.”
  • holding that a detective’s testimony that a co-worker had identified a man in a photograph as the defendant was inadmissible hearsay where the co-worker did not testify at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.