District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/14/2013
Constant v. State
Citations
- 120 So. 3d 122
- 2013 WL 4081079
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As an issue involving the admissibility of evidence, we review this matter for an abuse of discretion, limited by the rules of evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gross, Levine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- State v. WoodsMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-10-16· cited 38×
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-23· cited 34×
- Deviney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-02-21· cited 33×
- Padgett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-16· cited 10×
- Killian v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-24· cited 9×
- Valley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-29· cited 7×
- Bartholomew v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-31· cited 7×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-20· cited 1×
- Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-29· cited 1×
- Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.