State v. Woods
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5344
Syllabus
Motion to suppress; warrantless search; Fourth Amendment; unreasonable search and seizure; voluntary consent; implied consent; totality of the circumstances; factual findings; Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990); plain view. - Judgment affirmed. The totality of the circumstances based on the undisputed facts are sufficient to find that the State did not meet its burden of demonstrating that the facts applied to an exception to the warrant requirement.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 2,122×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court· 2013-03-26· cited 1,615×
- State v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 219×
- State v. Wintermeyer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-12-17· cited 80×
- State v. DiawOhio Supreme Court· 2025-07-02· cited 8×
- State v. ParrishOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-21· cited 4×
- State v. StewartOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-03· cited 4×
- Westlake v. DudasOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.