Skip to main content

State v. Stewart

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 1189

Syllabus

Fourth Amendment; warrantless entry; consent; search warrant; fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine; exclusionary rule. Judgment affirmed. The denial of the suppression motion was not in error. Appellant consented to officers' initial entry into his home to retrieve clothing for appellant to wear. The evidence was in plain view, and that observation can be used as the basis for a subsequent search warrant.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.