State v. Wood
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 2973
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress. The trial court's findings of fact were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The officers had reasonable articulable suspicion to conduct a lawful traffic stop where the officers had personally observed appellant, with whom they were familiar, driving a vehicle and had verified that appellant did not have a valid driver's license prior to initiating the traffic stop. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-30· cited 666×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- United States v. Joyce E. Hall, A/K/A Joyce E. SuttonD.C. Circuit· 1976-01-08· cited 182×
- United States v. Thomas Wayne Allison and Sharon Lynn FreedmanFifth Circuit· 1980-05-05· cited 80×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-22· cited 16×
- State v. PickettOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-14· cited 10×
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-28· cited 4×
- State v. LeveckOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-03-11· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.