Arizona Supreme Court· 10/11/1994

State v. Wood

Citations

881 P.2d 1158
180 Ariz. 53
175 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 34
1994 Ariz. LEXIS 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that prior threats are relevant to not only show intent but premeditation
noting that courts generally should not decide issues unnecessary to the disposition of an appeal
finding that impermissible hearsay evidence did not prejudice the defendant because “other witnesses presented direct testimony on the same issue”
finding that admitting one erroneous statement did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial \[g]iven the clear quantum of evidence supporting\ his conviction
concluding the jury could have found that police officers, who did not testify, acted with apprehension or fear when they reacted to defendant’s brandishing of a revolver by firing at him
considering facts contributing to officer victims’ reasonable apprehension even though those facts occurred before injury was imminent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Moeller, Corcoran, Zlaket, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.