Skip to main content

State v. Buchanan

Citations

  • 431 N.W.2d 542
  • 1988 Minn. LEXIS 277
  • 1988 WL 123769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding there was no abuse of discretion where excluded evidence duplicated other evidence and was thus cumulative and delaying
  • noting that the defendant had a duty to retreat before acting in self-defense because the shooting took place in the parking lot adjacent to his apartment
  • stating that evidence that “merely duplicated other evidence already presented” was cumulative
  • shooting a victim once, pausing, walking around the victim, and firing two more shots supported an inference of premeditation
  • affirming the district court’s decision to exclude as cumulative a defendant’s testimony about “prior witnessing of street violence” offered to show his state of mind for self-defense
  • “[W]here first shots are followed by a pause and second shots, an inference of premeditation is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.