State v. Winters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the lesser included offense when faced with multiplicitous convictions
• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the lesser included offense when faced with multiplicitous convictions
• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the lesser included offense when faced with multiplicitous convictions
• holding asserted error in order of presenting included offenses to jury was not clear error when jury was instructed to consider the crimes separately and distinctly, because instruction ensured verdict on one crime would not affect verdict on another
• “where convictions are multiplicitous the defendant should be sentenced only on the more severe offense”
• in cases of multiplicitous convictions, “the defendant should be sentenced only on the more severe offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-21· cited 301×
• State v. Trotter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-03-08· cited 243×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-08-09· cited 128×
• People v. Rhea
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-05-08· cited 64×
• – State v. Harris –
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-12-13· cited 45×
• State v. Hernandez
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-04-12· cited 37×
• State v. Hurt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 29×
• State v. Gomez
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-09-29· cited 11×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-12-23· cited 4×
• State v. Neal
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-09-30· cited 2×
• The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff–Appellee v. Jerry Lee RHEA, Defendant–Appellant.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-05-08