Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/12/2012

State v. Hernandez

Citations

273 P.3d 774
294 Kan. 200
2012 WL 1222218
2012 Kan. LEXIS 240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that courts may address issues likely to arise on remand when reversing on other grounds
holding trial court abused its discretion when it denied a motion for mistrial after erroneously concluding an issue could be dealt with at sentencing
opining that Monge \remains good law\
declining to address whether an Apprendi error in a noncapital case is equivalent to a determination that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction for double jeopardy purposes when the issue was not raised, briefed, or argued on appeal
when faced with inconsistent verdicts, a trial court has a duty to order the jury to reconsider and correct its verdicts
“K.S.A. 21-3107[2]jc] prohibits conviction of both the crime charged and an attempt to commit the crime charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen, Johnson, Beier, Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.