Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/15/2014
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 266 Or. App. 286
- 337 P.3d 948
- 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1412
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a defendant “cannot retroactively render the officer’s opinion inadmissible by himself eliciting information from (continued...
- jury would not perceive officer’s testimony that the defendant was under the influence of marijuana, based on the officer’s training and experience and the fact that the defendant “had dilated pupils and red, puffy ‘spider web’ eyes,” as “scientific”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hadlock, Ortega, Sercombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court· 2003-07-31· cited 72×
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-24· cited 41×
- State v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-31· cited 23×
- State v. AmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-04· cited 19×
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-08· cited 6×
- State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.