Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/8/2009
State v. Hernandez
Citations
- 206 P.3d 197
- 227 Or. App. 319
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the state’s argument that individual components of an incomplete DRE protocol were admissible as nonscientific expert evidence where the state failed to identify which elements of the protocol were nonscientific
- rejecting the state’s argument that individual components of an incomplete DRE protocol were admissible as nonscientific expert evidence where the state failed to identify which elements of the protocol were nonscientific
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Brewer, Riggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-31· cited 23×
- State v. Beltran-ChavezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-06· cited 20×
- State v. BevanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-09· cited 11×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 5×
- State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-12· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.