State v. Wilson
Citations
- 101 Kan. 789
- 168 P. 679
- 1917 Kan. LEXIS 199
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Trading Stamps — Construction of Statute — License Tax. Trading stamps' supplied by a stamp company to a retail merchant, under an agreement on his part that he is “to offer them to all cash customers when making purchases and when accepted give to his said cash customers one of said stamps for each ten cents represented in such payment, as a discount for cash,” are to be regarded as used “in, with, or for” the sale of goods, within the meaning of a statute requiring the payment of a license tax by any one furnishing stamps to be used in that manner.</p> <p>2. Same. In a provision of such a statute, exempting from its operation the furnishing of stamps “redeemable at their face value, in cash or merchandise from the general stock of said merchant at regular retail prices at the option of the holder thereof,” the phrase “said merchant” refers to the dealer to whom the stamps are furnished, and not to the concern furnishing them, the stamps being redeemable by that concern in cash or out of a special stock of goods kept and used by it only for that purpose.</p> <p>3. Same — Prohibitory License Tax — Power of Legislature. In the ease of a business which the state under its police power has a right to prohibit on the ground that it is injurious to the public, the legislature may exact as a requirement to its continuance the payment of a license tax so large as to be practically prohibitory.</p> <p>4. Same — Objections to Use of Stamps. Objections to trading stamps on public grounds are not so obviously unreasonable as to warrant a court in holding void a statute prohibiting their use.</p> <p>5. Same — Issued to Cash Customers Only — Power of Legislature. A trading-stamp device is not placed beyond legislative prohibition by the fact that the stamps are issued only to cash customers, and not to those purchasing on credit.</p> <p>6. Same — Method of Redemption — Not Discriminative. A statute imposing a license tax upon the use of tradin
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding trading stamp tax as a valid exercise of the police power because it had a \real relation to the public good\ and reasonably prevented \evil consequences to the public\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch, Mason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tri-State Hotel Co. v. LonderholmSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-12-11· cited 82×
- Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-04-26· cited 79×
- Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-01-15· cited 67×
- Standard Lbr. Co. v. PierceOregon Supreme Court· 1924-09-16· cited 65×
- Quality Oil Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1958-03-08· cited 39×
- Ray v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-01-22· cited 27×
- Carolene Products Co. v. MohlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1940-06-08· cited 24×
- State ex rel. Court of Industrial Relations v. HowatSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-07-19· cited 23×
- State v. HoltgreveUtah Supreme Court· 1921-09-07· cited 22×
- Steffey v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court· 1961-01-23· cited 21×
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. HoeghSupreme Court of Iowa· 1954-07-26· cited 21×
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-04-07· cited 20×
- In re IrishSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-05-08· cited 20×
- Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1957-10-09· cited 17×
- Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2016-01-22· cited 15×
- Youngblood v. QuallsD. Kansas· 2018-04-06· cited 13×
- Winkler v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-01-11· cited 12×
- Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1921-12-10· cited 12×
- Capital Gas & Electric Co. v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1933-06-10· cited 12×
- McDermott v. City of SeattleW.D. Washington· 1933-10-31· cited 11×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1897-03-01· cited 582×
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court· 1912-01-22· cited 228×
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1903-01-05· cited 177×
- State v. PitneyWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-16· cited 48×
- Pitney v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1916-03-06· cited 30×
- Winters v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-05-09· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Brewster v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-07-07· cited 9×
- Scriven v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-01-06· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.