Pitney v. Washington

Citations

• 240 U.S. 387
• 36 S. Ct. 385
• 60 L. Ed. 703
• 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1459

Syllabus

<p>On authority of Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., ante, p. 342, and Tanner v. Little, ante, p. 369, held that the trading stamp license statute of Washington is not unconstitutional under the commerce-clause of, or the due process or equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment to, the Federal Constitution.</p> <p>79 Washington, 608, affirmed.</p>