Skip to main content

State v. Wilson

Citations

  • 995 P.2d 1260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Martinez, and holding that a victim may recover attorney fees incurred as a direct result of the crime for which restitution is being ordered
  • distinguishing Martinez, and holding that a victim may recover attorney fees incurred as a direct result of the crime for which restitution is being ordered
  • affirming restitution for investigative costs where “but for the embezzlement, the victim would not have incurred” the costs
  • upholding award for investigation expenses incurred in ascertaining the extent of defendant’s embezzlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.