State v. Wilson

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 2980

Syllabus

Motion to Sever Expert Testimony regarding Cell Phone Data Analysis Sufficiency Speedy Trial Consecutive Sentences. Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to sever where a statement made by his co-defendant did not violate the rule of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed. 2d 476 (1968). Trial court did not err in allowing an expert to testify regarding cell phone location analysis. Defendant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence. Defendant's speedy trial rights were not violated where he entered a valid waiver after he was provided with the alleged Bruton statement. Trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences.