State v. Brown
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4707
Syllabus
Consecutive sentences, imposition of costs, indigent, remanded for resentencing. Trial court erred by failing to make the necessary findings for the imposition of consecutive sentences. Because the court failed to make the necessary findings, case is remanded for the limited purpose of determining whether consecutive sentences should be imposed and, if so, making the required findings. It is within the trial court's discretion to waive costs for an indigent defendant the discretion also includes the discretion not to waive them. A finding of indigence for purposes of appointment of counsel is insufficient to warrant a waiver of costs and fines at sentencing.
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. NiaOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-12· cited 71×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-25· cited 17×
- State v. MagwoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-26· cited 13×
- State v. FrostOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-19· cited 9×
- State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-11· cited 5×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-22· cited 5×
- State v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-01· cited 3×
- State v. LaSallaOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-15· cited 2×
- State v. LawrenceOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-23· cited 2×
- State v. MastersOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.