Skip to main content

State v. Wilson

Citations

  • 406 N.W.2d 442
  • 1987 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[although the publicity [was] inflammatory and contained] prejudicial material, it [did] not rise to the level of pervasive and inflammatory publicity that would deny the defendant a fair trial”
  • relying in part on Holbrook to hold that visible shackling is inherently prejudicial, overruling prior decision that refused to presume prejudice
  • holding evidence that a male murder victim possessed child pornography and wore women’s clothing was properly excluded as unfairly prejudicial, since the jury may have concluded that the victim “deserved to die”
  • “On rare occasions, however, shackling a defendant may be justified despite the fact that some prejudice will occur.”
  • “[A] defendant is entitled to the indicia of innocence in the presence of the jury.”
  • “A criminal defendant is presumed innocent until his guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiyerin, Larson, Carter, Wolle, Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.