United States v. William Harry Hack, Jr., Lucas Clinton Owens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding statements made two days after gunshot wound to defendant’s mouth while defendant was still in pain were voluntary
• noting that visible shackles were justified by a substantial need to protect the safety of the court from the violent propensities of defendant and to prevent threatened escape
• noting that visible shackles were justified by a substantial need to protect the safety of the court from the violent propensities of defendant and to prevent threatened escape
• noting that visible shackles were justified by a substantial need to protect the safety of the court from the violent propensities of defendant and to prevent threatened escape
• acknowledging the significant deference given to the trial court in determining whether security measures are necessary regarding a particular defendant
• acknowledging the significant deference given to the trial court in determining whether security measures are necessary regarding a particular defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).