Court of Appeals of Iowa· 5/30/1995

State v. Johnson

Citations

534 N.W.2d 118
1995 Iowa App. LEXIS 62
1995 WL 424882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding improper comments that were limited to a rebuttal argument and not repeatedly presented to the jury, although improper, are not prejudicial
holding improper comments that were limited to a rebuttal argument and not repeatedly presented to the jury, although improper, are not prejudicial
concluding language of the class “D” felony version of the predecessor statute “implies a general criminal intent”
“The 3 The trial information and jury instructions made clear the State was alleging Wulf committed theft by deception. 4 Each page of transcript includes twenty-five lines. 14 [S]tate cannot compel a defendant to stand trial in identifiable prison clothing.”
“Generally criminal intent is an essential element of an offense.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donielson, Hayden, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.