Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/4/1989

State v. Williamson

Citations

212 Conn. 6
562 A.2d 470
1989 Conn. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

in context of violation of Practice Book § 752, “bad faith” means done with intent to deprive defendant of information
witness did not review the transcript of her statement until the first day of trial, some seven months after she had made the statement
numerous inconsistencies between prior statements and trial testimony was a major factor in determining that the state had not proven harmlessness of nondisclosure
fact that transcript of tape not reviewed by witness until seven months after alleged crime significant in determining that state had not proven harmlessness
defendant’s conviction obviously rested on the testimony of the victim-witness whose tape recorded statement had been destroyed
several critical inconsistencies between witness’ transcribed statement and witness’ recollection of what she told police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glass, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.