Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/27/2017
State v. Williams
Citations
- 521 S.W.3d 689
- 2017 WL 2778052
- 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the hand-search of a student’s person because he was tardy for school (which resulted in the discovery of drugs in the student’s pocket) violated the student’s Fourth Amendment rights
- holding the hand-search of a student’s person because he was tardy for school, which resulted in the discovery of drugs in the student’s pocket, violated the student’s Fourth Amendment rights
- noting that school officials physically touching the student by conducting a “pat-down” “exacerbate[d] the intrusive nature of the search” that resulted in illegal drugs being found on the student’s person
- “Rather than a search conducted to promote students’ welfare and safety, the policy here operated, in large part, with a law- enforcement purpose. As a result, the intrusiveness of the search under a constitutional analysis is very, very high.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dowd, Gaertner, Odenwald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 523×
- Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. EarlsSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 498×
- Safford Unified School District 1 v. ReddingSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 365×
- State v. LingarSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-03-17· cited 172×
- State v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-04-26· cited 104×
- People v. William G.California Supreme Court· 1985-12-05· cited 93×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-02-21· cited 74×
- Jason Shade, Individually v. City of Farmington, Minnesota, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation Ted Dau, Individually and in His Official CapacityEighth Circuit· 2002-11-06· cited 53×
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 36×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-11-20· cited 33×
- Doe v. Little Rock School DistrictEighth Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 26×
- State of Missouri v. Charles A. Selvy, Jr.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-04-07· cited 20×
- D.I.R. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-07-23· cited 16×
- Hough v. Shakopee Public SchoolsD. Minnesota· 2009-03-30· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.