Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 521 S.W.3d 689
  • 2017 WL 2778052
  • 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the hand-search of a student’s person because he was tardy for school (which resulted in the discovery of drugs in the student’s pocket) violated the student’s Fourth Amendment rights
  • holding the hand-search of a student’s person because he was tardy for school, which resulted in the discovery of drugs in the student’s pocket, violated the student’s Fourth Amendment rights
  • noting that school officials physically touching the student by conducting a “pat-down” “exacerbate[d] the intrusive nature of the search” that resulted in illegal drugs being found on the student’s person
  • “Rather than a search conducted to promote students’ welfare and safety, the policy here operated, in large part, with a law- enforcement purpose. As a result, the intrusiveness of the search under a constitutional analysis is very, very high.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd, Gaertner, Odenwald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.