State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Testimony that is not impeached, discredited, or controverted, nor is self-contradicting or physically impossible, must be accepted by the trial court.”
• “We agree with the State that the officer had probable cause to stop Williams based on the violation of a pedestrian traffic statute, section 316.130[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Florida v. Reddick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-09
• Z.S.F., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-09-03

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Whren v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
• Abel v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 1,485×
• Connor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-06· cited 331×
• Teffeteller v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-03-04· cited 118×
• Holland v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-07-03· cited 93×
• Hilton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-07-05· cited 60×
• State v. Daniel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-09-28· cited 38×
• State v. Nittolo
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-07-30· cited 16×
• State v. Lampley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-29· cited 13×
• State v. G.H.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-10· cited 12×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-15· cited 11×
• Raehn v. Raehn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-15· cited 5×
• State v. Nichols
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-30· cited 2×