Skip to main content

Holland v. State

Citations

  • 696 So. 2d 757
  • 1997 WL 365544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding violation of traffic law gives officer probable cause to stop vehicle
  • stating that \subjective viewpoints no longer factor into the analysis\
  • applying Whren and explaining that the test is whether an officer could have stopped the vehicle for a traffic infraction
  • applying the objective standard established in Whren in state constitutional analysis and noting “the Whren Court made it clear that subjective viewpoints no longer factor into the analysis”
  • applying the objective standard established in Whren in state constitutional analysis and noting “the Whren Court made it clear that subjective viewpoints no longer factor into the analysis”
  • adopting the objective test set forth in Whren v. United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harding

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.