State v. Williams
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3802
Syllabus
Anders consecutive sentences sentences contrary to law effective assistance of counsel. The attorney assigned to the appellant was permitted to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The appellant filed a pro se brief. The trial court did not err when it sentenced the appellant to consecutive sentences and the sentences were not contrary to law. The appellant did not demonstrate that his trial counsel's performance was deficient.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-22· cited 92×
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-05-03· cited 40×
- State v. ConnorsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-27· cited 29×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-25· cited 13×
- State v. EssingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 9×
- State v. RamseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-19· cited 9×
- State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.