Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3802

Syllabus

Anders consecutive sentences sentences contrary to law effective assistance of counsel. The attorney assigned to the appellant was permitted to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The appellant filed a pro se brief. The trial court did not err when it sentenced the appellant to consecutive sentences and the sentences were not contrary to law. The appellant did not demonstrate that his trial counsel's performance was deficient.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.