Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 932 S.W.2d 546
  • 1995 WL 515834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence legally and factually sufficient to support jury’s finding highway department had actual notice when it was undisputed that (a) highway department was conducting “potholing” operation just south of accident site, (b
  • “Whether by cross-examination or advocacy, counsel can comment on the credibility of witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramey, Holcomb, Hadden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.