State v. Williams
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5560
Syllabus
Appeal from the trial court's imposition of the applicable costs of supervision, confinement, and appointed counsel as part of defendant's sentence. Costs of supervision are not applicable because defendant was sentenced to prison, not community control. Costs of confinement are supported by the record considering defendant's age and work history. Costs of appointed counsel are contrary to law because they are a civil assessment and cannot be included as part of the sentence.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-22· cited 40×
- State v. VelesquezOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-31· cited 15×
- State v. EatonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-05· cited 9×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-15· cited 9×
- Ohio v. ConninOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-17· cited 8×
- State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-15· cited 6×
- State v. BurtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-12· cited 5×
- State v. SaxerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-29· cited 5×
- State v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-22· cited 2×
- State v. De La RosaOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.