Skip to main content
· 9/29/2023

State v. Saxer

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3548

Syllabus

Sulek, J. R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) does not permit an appellate court to review the trial court's consideration and balancing of the factors in R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 in determining an appropriate prison sentence. Imposition of a discretionary fine is not contrary to law where the record reflects the trial court's consideration of the appellant's ability to pay. Imposition of the costs of appointed counsel as part of a criminal sentence is contrary to law.

Judges: Sulek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.