Skip to main content

State v. Henderson

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4576

Syllabus

Zmuda, writing for the majority, affirms, in part, and reverses, in part, regarding imposition of discretionary costs, as trial court entered discretionary costs in the judgment entry without first addressing those costs at the sentencing hearing.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.