Supreme Court of New Jersey· 5/22/1972
State v. Wilkerson
Citations
- 291 A.2d 8
- 60 N.J. 452
- 1972 N.J. LEXIS 261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that trial court has “ultimate discretion” on issue of readbacks
- approving \one-on-one identifications made at the scene of the initial observation whether or not it be the scene of the crime or within a reasonably short time thereafter\
- “Normally a trial court, which has ultimate discretion in the matter, should readily accede to any request by a jury to have any particular testimony read to it during its deliberations.”
- upholding one-on-one identification by witness ninety minutes after observation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mountain, Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-08-17· cited 366×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-03-14· cited 220×
- State v. MichaelsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-03-26· cited 95×
- State v. HerreraSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-06-20· cited 73×
- State v. RichardsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-02-28· cited 25×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2000-11-20· cited 22×
- State v. MiddletonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-03-21· cited 22×
- State v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-07-22· cited 18×
- State v. DeBellisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-05-23· cited 14×
- State v. McNeilNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-07-16· cited 10×
- State v. FordNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-05-09· cited 9×
- State v. LeakNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-05-06· cited 8×
- State of New Jersey v. Alfred J. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-07-29· cited 7×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-06-05· cited 6×
- State v. BrentNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-07-06· cited 5×
- State v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-05-17· cited 5×
- State v. GarriganNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-07-06· cited 4×
- State v. Quintin D. WatsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2023-08-02
- State of New Jersey v. Fuquan K. KnightNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2023-12-21
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- Bobby Russell v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-05-26· cited 240×
- State v. FunicelloSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1972-01-17· cited 99×
- State v. WolfSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-03-01· cited 71×
- United States v. Eugene Gaines, in 19405Third Circuit· 1971-11-01· cited 58×
- Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 46×
- State v. BibbsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1970-12-14· cited 36×
- State v. EdgeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-02-22· cited 25×
- United States v. Franklin PerryD.C. Circuit· 1971-06-01· cited 22×
- State v. ThomasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-10-07· cited 19×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 19×
- United States v. Larry E. EvansD.C. Circuit· 1971-02-25· cited 15×
- People v. KirbyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1970-03-10· cited 11×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 5×
- State v. MoralesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-10-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.