United States v. Eugene Gaines, in 19405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial judge, who continually instructed jury that they were the sole determiners of fact and credibility, had not overstepped the bounds of properjudicial comment by making statements about issues of fact in light of the complete jury charge
• no undue influence where trial judge informed the jury six times during charge that it had to make the ultimate adjudication in the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).