State v. Wild

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to exclude testimony without first considering whether the State's noncompliance was for good cause
• \A finding of good cause does not preclude exclusion of the evidence as a sanction; exclusion is just no longer mandatory.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Eichman
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 78×
• State Ex Rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1997-04-22· cited 61×
• State v. DeLao
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2002-05-07· cited 36×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-05-06· cited 23×
• State v. Hahn
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1998-08-20· cited 13×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Krull
  Supreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,170×
• United States v. Arturo Rodriguez, Vincente Ramirez
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 149×
• State v. Zielke
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1987-04-03· cited 95×
• People v. Rayford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-11-01· cited 62×
• Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-11-27· cited 46×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-03-27· cited 30×
• Irby v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-10-02· cited 24×
• State v. Hahn
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1986-06-19· cited 23×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-02-25· cited 8×
• Brownsell v. Klawitter
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-10-24· cited 6×