Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 5/6/2004
State v. Miller
Citations
- 2004 WI App 117
- 683 N.W.2d 485
- 274 Wis. 2d 471
- 2004 Wisc. App. LEXIS 393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- establishing that “final judgment” for claim preclusion means a judgment that “ends the litigation on the merits of the claim or claims”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deininger, Dykman, Vergeront
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. McMillianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-05-18· cited 10×
- State v. Carl Lee McAdoryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2024-04-11· cited 3×
- Hegwood v. City of Eau ClaireW.D. Wisconsin· 2009-11-10· cited 1×
- State v. Purifoy (In re Commitment of Purifoy)Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-06-04
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 76×
- State v. KenyonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-10-03· cited 73×
- Tomczak v. BaileyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1998-05-22· cited 70×
- State v. DeLaoWisconsin Supreme Court· 2002-05-07· cited 36×
- Manu-Tronics, Inc. v. Effective Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1991-05-08· cited 25×
- Acharya v. AFSCME, Council 24, WSEU, AFL-CIO, Local No. 1Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-09-29· cited 17×
- State v. WildCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-07-27· cited 14×
- Russell v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1961-10-03· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.