Skip to main content
· 7/23/1985

United States v. Arturo Rodriguez, Vincente Ramirez

Citations

  • 765 F.2d 1546
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that possession of a gun is relevant to show intent to distribute
  • admitting two firearms into evidence even without a showing of a direct connection to the charges because guns are often “tools of the trade” for drug dealers, and because the evidence thus had circumstantial relevance to defendant’s intent on drug conspiracy count

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vance, Anderson, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.