Skip to main content

State v. Wilcoxson

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 4339

Syllabus

Appellant's claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to move for a trial continuance lacks merit because moving for a continuance is a debatable trial strategy that will not be second-guessed on appeal. Appellant's claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a timely jury demand also lacks merit because appellant failed to establish how counsel's alleged deficient performance prejudiced him. Appellant's claim that his right to due process was violated as a result of the State's failure to provide certain video evidence in discovery lacks merit because appellant failed to establish any resulting prejudice. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.