Skip to main content
· 5/11/1976

Pepin v. City of Danbury

Citations

  • 171 Conn. 74
  • 368 A.2d 88
  • 1976 Conn. LEXIS 1141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • regarding special benefit assessments levied pursuant to General Statutes § 7-249
  • action for a declaratory judgment determining whether the tax formula of the named defendant, and the levy of taxes pursuant thereto, is valid
  • ‘‘a municipality may exercise the taxing power only to that extent to which such power has been specifically granted by the legislature’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • insufficient evidence to establish special confidential relationship between parents-in-law and daughter-in-law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Cotter, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Barber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.