State v. Whipple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in a legal malpractice cases expert testimony is 15 admissible to establish that an attorney breached the standard of care
• adopting Davis rule, but in context of right to remain silent where defendant repeatedly said, \No more!\ to questions being put to him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rogers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
• State v. Payne
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2008-12-15· cited 235×
• Peña v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2004-10-06· cited 48×
• Pena v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2004-10-06· cited 37×
• State v. Avila-Nava
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-12-26· cited 28×
• Hadden v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2002-03-15· cited 21×
• Munson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2005-11-18· cited 17×
• State v. Law
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-01-11· cited 14×
• Cooke v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-02-23· cited 13×
• State v. Siegel
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-04-26· cited 13×
• State v. Teasley
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-09-30· cited 12×
• State v. Eytchison
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2001-07-09· cited 12×
• Burno v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-08-07· cited 7×
• State v. Perez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-02-20· cited 7×
• State v. Rollins
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-07-19· cited 5×
• State v. Cochran
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-05-26· cited 4×
• State of Idaho v. Darrell Edward Payne
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2008-06-18
• State v. Tyler Ray Carter
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-02-08
• Monroe v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2006-01-10