Skip to main content

State v. West

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 4069

Syllabus

Because the defendant-appellant's sentence is within the sentencing range and the trial court considered the purposes and principles of felony sentencing set forth under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12, her sentence is not contrary to law. The trial court's order of restitution and order that the defendant-appellant pay the costs of prosecution is not contrary to law.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.